Office Products : Brother PT-1280 P-touch Electronic Labeling System |
|
|

Rating: - * AC Adaptor scam ... I understand that I did not check out if this came with an AC adaptor. However, to price an adaptor [...] more than that of the product itself [...] does not seem correct. You are better off paying for a higher end model that comes with an adaptor. Atleast you get more features for your money. Rating: - * Terrible Product ... This all started when I wanted to get a labeler to get more organized. I started with the Brother P-Touch PT-80 which worked as advertised, but ate batteries so fast that I couldn't keep up with it. I eventually had a friend take it apart and solder a plug so that it runs from the wall power (used a plug that you can change the voltage on it, like you find at Radio Shack). When the time came to get another labeler for my office, I decided to try this model (PT-1280) since it came with the option for a wall plug. This product is so terrible that I would rather buy another PT-80 and take that one apart to make it run off a wall plug. That is how bad this product is - I'd rather void the warranty of another device than use this out-of-the-box junk. The main issue is that by default this device does not print labels correctly within the margins. All research seems to point that you need to reset your margins and text size every time you want to print. When a device can't seem to do even its basic function correctly, it's time to look for another device. Brother should be embarrassed that this product is still being sold with their name on it. I've started using some tape and a marker instead of picking up this labeler. If you are looking for an easy solution, this is not the product for you. Pick another company or at least a different Brother product. Rating: - * Do Not Waste Your Money! ... If I could give this labeler negative stars, I would. It is a money waster. Every time you print a label, it wastes 2 inches of label tape on either side and you have to end up cutting the excess off. The label tape is very expensive and the labeler continously wastes it! Please consider another labeler because you will hate making labels with this one! Rating: - * Not bad for a labeler under $30. ... Slightly annoyed by the amount of tape that it wastes but for under $30, not a bad purchase for someone who needs a labeler on occasion. If you are a bit OCD or like to label everything, perhaps you may want to look elsewhere? Rating: - * PT-1280 is a cheap machine to buy, expensive to keep in labels! ... Agree with ALL of the reviews about the PT-1280 wasting label ribbon. I bought this machine about 4 months ago at a Staples while I was in store to fill an immediate need. Sadly, I didn't do my normal research & check how much it was on Amazon or, more importantly, read any reviews. The cost of the machine itself is cheap, but the label ribbons are so pricey you think twice about labelling. In addition to the narrow margin & chain print functions (which you have to set EVERY time), another way I've managed to get more out of the label ribbon is by using the carriage return/ENTER key. I stack titles on top of one another to make the ribbon last longer. But again, you have to use scissors to trim the 2 separate lines in 1/2 - which defeats the purpose of having a label maker... I wouldn't buy this again ever. But since I have it I buy labels from ptouchdirect to make the best of a bad situation. |

The real joy of the set, however, is nine NBA playoff games presented as they were originally broadcast and almost in their entirety. They last about 90-100 minutes with TV introductions and post-game interviews, but minus halftime, commercials, and some slower moments. The games include such absolute classics as the game in which rookie Magic Johnson started at center in place of Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and the 1987 "baby hook" game against the Boston Celtics. If you're used to watching current NBA games you might be tempted to just skip to the end, but it's surprisingly rewarding to watch the game develop, to watch the game's superstars strut their stuff (or see a couple of 1972 reserves named Phil Jackson and Pat Riley), and to observe how radically the sport has changed over the years. Variable picture quality and technical glitches are unavoidable (even the 2002 game looks washed out), but this is the first time complete or nearly complete NBA games have been available in the home-video era, and they probably still look better than the VHS tapes you've been saving over the years. Yes, it'd be easy to argue about which games from the Lakers' long history should have been included, and the highlight videos don't have a ton of replay value, but the NBA Dynasty series is a major milestone in archived sports. --David Horiuchi
